Category Archives: Elections

What Happened to Critical Thinking?

There are words used every day in the political lexicon to hide reality.

Refugee and illegal are two of those words.

Did you know it’s illegal to enter this country, as well as others without a passport? A Visa is required if your stay is longer than 6 months or you want to work in that country. You must check with the country you want to enter to understand and obtain the necessary permits before you enter. Detain and deport are exercised by each country as they desire, not as you wish.
passport_only_required_countries
It doesn’t matter the reason, if someone comes into the USA or any country, they need to gain access through immigration.

What we seem to want to do is come up with different exceptions to suit our emotional context.

That’s when a nation of laws becomes a nation of whatever feels good, do it. This was the motto that emerged from the 60’s hippy movement. It’s not a sensible way to live.

I suggest everyone that wants to allow people to enter this country illegally, begin a personal family foster program. Just let them into your home. Why not, they have it much worse than you? While you’re at it take in a homeless person or two.

The critical problems we have get worse because people refuse to act like responsible adults. We want to be considered compassionate, but we forget that sometimes, no, is the correct response.

We don’t know who we let in without proper border screening. They may carry diseases, such as small pox or tuberculosis. In our confusion of emotion over intelligence, we block out any questions of what do we do, how do we properly provide, and what do we do with our homeless and “refugees“? Do we just set up sanctuary cities then sue the federal government for not picking up the tab? I grow weary hearing speeches designed for TV consumers and a short attention span audience.

Build the walls, barriers necessary to block all entry. Screen all those who wish to come in. Fix what’s broke first, before adding to our already overloaded local areas. First consider taking care of our veterans who served, sacrificed, then through the ravages of war, came back home unable to fit back in to a civilian world, and to a people who pretend the government is finding solutions.

There’s no options that have been discussed, other than providing proper border security. I would like our elected officials hold to their oath of office and protect this country from threats foreign and domestic.

Here’s what a person is required to swear in order to gain citizenship in the USA.
The current Oath of Allegiance of the United States is as follows:

I hereby declare, on oath, that I absolutely and entirely renounce and abjure all allegiance and fidelity to any foreign prince, potentate, state, or sovereignty of whom or which I have heretofore been a subject or citizen; that I will support and defend the Constitution and laws of the United States of America against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I will bear arms on behalf of the United States when required by the law; that I will perform non-combatant service in the Armed Forces of the United States when required by the law; that I will perform work of national importance under civilian direction when required by the law; and that I take this obligation freely without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; so help me God.

According to U.S. regulations, the phrase “so help me God” is optional and that the words ‘on oath’ can be substituted with ‘and solemnly affirm’.


I’m Confused

Newly elected President - exit of former President

Pres. elect Barack Obama with former Pres. George W. Bush

After yesterday’s Robert Mueller testimony, I have many unanswered questions.

We’ve become accustomed to some degree or another with patterns, habits, and societal cues. These may be for practical reasons, such as which side of the road to drive on, or saying excuse me for accidentally bumping into someone.

Can we go our own way, yet all be going the same way? What is it that drives people, as if they’re cattle to follow miscues, false rumors, and the foolishness of partisanship without merit?

Among the many times we’ve collectively witnessed the baying hounds of radical partisanship, who attempt to unseat a President, they insist that Donald Trump couldn’t have fairly won the 2016 Presidential election over their anointed candidate, Hillary Clinton.

It’s beyond any reasonable limit to pursue something that began from a circulated and purposefully leaked, false dossier. From that, a FISA warrant was issued that began this long dive down a rabbit hole of all too apparent nonsense. If you’re unable to see this for what it is, then you too have been sucked into the vortex of political Kabuki theater.

The Mueller Report was to be the final nail in the coffin of Donald Trump. Instead, after yesterday’s public hearing, which had Robert Mueller come forward to testify about a report he said was sufficient unto itself. On one hand, it basically said, there’s no conclusive evidence to prove Trump colluded with the Russians. He left the door swinging when his report suggested, their investigation couldn’t exonerate him either.

“Mueller said at a May press conference in Washington that the report his office released following the probe into Russian 2016 election meddling was tantamount to his testimony. His lengthy report found no evidence the Trump campaign colluded with Russians to influence the election, but did list 10 possible instances of obstruction of justice by the president during the probe. Mueller also announced his office was closing up shop at the news conference.”

Robert_Mueller_hearing_July_19

former FBI director, Mueller appeared disoriented during testimony

“The Democrats who lead the Judiciary and Intelligence Committees in U.S. House of Representatives decided to subpoena Mueller to testify, announcing on June 25 that the former FBI head would appear before lawmakers in open session July 17. The date was later changed to July 24.”

If you don’t find the person guilty, doesn’t that conclude, innocence?

“Mueller spent two years & about $35 million on an exhaustive investigation that did not conclude that the president was not guilty of some form of criminality.”

The whole absurd, convoluted result was perfectly summarized in Mueller’s oracular pronouncement at his press conference on May 29: “If we had had confidence that the president clearly did not commit a crime, we would have said so.”

Perhaps there’s nothing I can say which changes opinions, but my understanding of the legal system is, we’re innocent until proven guilty. A lack of evidence suggests the person is innocent, not some other convoluted outcome.

Twisted judicial logic?

President_Trump_podiumSome see Donald Trump as a self-indulgent sybarite, not as a statesman. None the less he has attempted to find ways to bridge the gulf between the US and North Korea, chosen a contentious but successful path to get the NATO partners to pay more of their financial burden, and lead the nation to greater prosperity and lowest unemployment numbers, in decades.

Now, assuming the original accusations were well founded, then we must ask, who was in charge of national security, prevention of espionage, as well as ensuring fair and accurate elections, without interference from foreign powers, in 2016?

Above all that, we were hearing speeches from Barack Obama, and Hillary Clinton, that our elections were fair, honest, and accurate. They said this in 2014, 2015, and 2016. What changed? Weren’t they the ones in charge?

The Republicans weren’t any more immune to this radical partisanship. We saw this carried out to the extreme with President Barack Obama. Donald Trump led the parade of fools, claiming Obama was born in a foreign country and the Hawaii birth certificate was a fake. From month to month an Arizona Sheriff as well as Trump claimed they had conclusive evidence Obama wasn’t a natural born citizen. That wasn’t they only constant accusation, but certainly one of the most ridiculous.

This whole potpourri of inanity needs to come to a conclusion, and a end. It’s time the American people quit acting like a collection of ‘Stepford Wives’, and recognize they’re being played.

 

Can We Be This Blind?

How Trump Turned Liberal Comedians Conservative
By JOANNA WEISS – June 15, 2019

I find this writing an example of “liberal irony”. It’s OK to be liberal or conservative, but there are extremes. What I have witnessed since Donald Trump took office, the nature of criticism and outright hatred against him, has been magnified to a level well beyond any previous administration.

President_Trump_Camp_David_2017

· President Trump signs the Hurricane Harvey relief bill 2017

The expression, “Trump Derangement Syndrome” seems like an accurate label, as people have become unhinged, to the point that anything can be justified because of Trump.

This article in Politico, which I’m referencing is an example of the irony, and the mislabeling of characteristics which are the domain of the modern liberal. The author is suggesting that vile comments, the hatred, are the domain of conservatism. It’s as though one can say, I’m a liberal, hatred spews from my mouth, but that’s a conservative trait. Folks, this is the epitome of a lack of self-awareness.

A week after the 2016 elections, many left wing activists took to the streets to express their angst with some causing riots all across the nation.

anonymous-anarchists-2017

· Protestors who covered their faces – some of whom decided to damage property

– – – – – – Quotes follow – – – – – –
There’s no greater threat to the liberal establishment than Donald Trump.

“If Trump has changed the tone of the presidency, he’s done the same for TV humor, creating a kind of insult comedy for the Resistance: less subtle, less civil—and, strangely, more conservative.

… “liberals and conservatives are (on average) wired differently, with social and cultural conservatives personally more attuned to danger, worried about intruders, primed to protect an establishment under threat.

*NOTE* see first sentence of the quotes from the article. This is irony or self-deception.

“As outrage, however, it does contain something that satire lacks, University of Delaware communications professor Dannagal Young says: a consistent call to action. That feels like the purpose of this brand of late night comedy—not to wryly observe the world and encourage us all to do better, but to harness people’s anger, make them ready to revolt.

*NOTE 2: Harness anger? Ready to revolt? Not to encourage people to do better? Where’s all this angst & hatred coming from?
– – – – – – Quotes end – – – – – –

There is a growing, war being waged against the Trump administration and conservatives in general. Most of that war is being orchestrated and funded by the massively-financed elite who want to change the system in order to benefit themselves. Although they’ve prospered enormously through capitalism, they see socialism as a vehicle to further their collective agenda. Socialism, or as it’s often relabeled, “democratic socialism”, is a shift in power for those elites to hold all the power.

Whenever you read or hear the claims for a new world order, improved society, basic human rights, the role of government is to provide __X__, then look further into those promises, they come at a horrific cost.

Someone, some government agency, must decide what’s fair, divides who gets what in this social order, and has the power to enforce. What do you think happens to any human contrived organization with this kind of power? Power corrupts – absolute power corrupts absolutely. It’s been repeated throughout history, from monarchs, oligarchs, patriarchs, national committees, or single national party’s.

Capitalism and freedom are under constant attack.

“Capitalism does a number of things very well: it helps create an entrepreneurial spirit; it gets people motivated to come up with new ideas, and that’s a good thing.”” ~ Bernie Sanders

“Capitalism has not always existed in the world and will not always exist in the world.” ~ Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez

Death to freedom, liberty, the needs of state over the individual, evolve through promises and platitudes. The false promise of everyone benefits, and no one is left without, is a lie. History points to the corrupt and diseased status of the state which operates under the thumb of socialism. We can already see the paucity of their claims in cities under decades of “Democrat” control. Flint Michigan, Chicago Illinois, San Francisco California, Los Angeles California, Seattle Washington, and so forth.
anti-trump_ralley_2017
When the state or committee take over, nothing opposing their rules, all real prosperity, advancement & hope are lost. Capitalism may have it’s faults, however Socialism is controlled by the elite few along with their cronies. Their goal is to have total control over assets, medical care, manufacturing, utilities, transportation, agriculture and even public speech.

Socialism states that you owe me something simply because I exist. Capitalism, by contrast, results in a sort of reality-forced altruism: I may not want to help you, I may dislike you, but if I don’t give you a product or service you want, I will starve. Voluntary exchange is more moral than forced redistribution.” ~ Ben Shapiro

Bucky Fuller standing in front of geodesic dome

R. Buckminster Fuller – we still haven’t caught up to his vision.