There’s always ample opportunity to go to war around the globe. There are wars in sub-Saharan Africa, wars in South America, Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, Libya and even on the city streets in the U.S. People by the millions are slaughtered for a cause everywhere without any definition of purpose other than to be in opposition with each other.
September 11, 2001 set the U.S. on fire with the intention to right the wrongs of destruction and death on American soil. Since shortly after that time we have been actively fighting two wars up until recently. We’re still firmly involved in Afghanistan and constantly threatening to do harm to Iran if they should cross some loosely defined line in the sand over possession of nuclear weapons.
Now we’re looking to enter the fray against Syria in a poorly authenticated accusation of an internal war crime whereby some 1400 people were put to death by supposed chemical weapons.  We haven’t been able to prove to the world community at large that the President of Syria is responsible let alone how we intend to right the wrongs of those killed within a civil war in Syria.
Up until recently, we have portrayed ourselves as friendly associates with President Bashar al-Assad. Numerous junkets between our government political leaders and theirs have come back with assurances this man wants peace in his region. Now suddenly under a storm of internal strife it’s supposed to be our duty to right the wrongs of those cruelly harmed in an internal Syrian conflict.
We keep hearing words like, this is not acceptable (but our missiles are), a line in the sand has been crossed and President Assad is a barbarian which would make Genghis Khan seem reputable. Now that we’ve been giving these numerous warnings to Syria, President Obama wants to at least launch some cruise missiles somewhere in the region and make someone rue the day!
Meanwhile the British had a vote in Parliament which basically sorted things out and declared, The Lords & Ladies of the United Kingdom decline the invitation of the most honorable and respected President Barrack Obama to ‘go medieval’ on Syria. They would much rather read about it in the Times while stirring tea and eating scones.
France has joined in with a slightly more terse objection to the stern warning given by her across the channel neighbor. They have issued a nine page report which verifies an attack took place and people were killed by conventional and chemical weapons. Their immediate response is to wait to debate the issue in an extraordinary session of parliament on Wednesday.
John Kerry got into the war of words comparing Assad to Hitler. This is a common comparison we use in America to describe people we don’t like, such as anyone that belongs to the Tea Party, Pro-Life or voted for George Bush or Sarah Palin in either of the previous decade of elections.
You can see the absolute disgust Mr. Kerry and his wife had in their prior years at a semi-private dinner they shared with Syrian dictator Bashar al-Assad and his wife.
In years prior to the Heinz-Kerry / Assad dinner party, Ms. Nancy Pelosi whisked herself and staff on a jet over against the wishes of her President, George Bush because after all, Bush is equivalent to a Nazi war criminal and as she later declared about the Hitler wanna-be she shared stories and laughs with in Syria, President Assad is a man of peace.
When Nancy Pelosi visited with President Bashar al-Assad of Syria in 2007 it was seen as a strong signal of re-engagement with Syria by the United States. Ms. Pelosi said that during the talks with Mr. Assad she had “expressed concern about Syria’s support for Hezbollah and Hamas,” and had “expressed our interest in using our good offices in promoting peace between Israel and Syria.“
Hmmm… That all seems rather productive now. It’s a good thing she gave him such a good lecture. He’s behaved well ever since….
Meanwhile in the U.S. President Obama has had to interrupt his bi-monthly golf sabbatical to speak at a podium on the evils of Syria. Realizing before he was to make such a speech he would have no Republicans to blame if he signed an executive order involving the U.S. in some sort of fracas. He changed his mind and decided to call Congress and get them to agree to at least lob a few missiles on behalf of Al-Qaeda… er… saving children…. enhancing peace and stability in the region… promoting a strong economy.
 The alleged chemical attack took place in the Ghouta, an agricultural belt around the capital on 21 August. The US put the death toll at 1,429, including 426 children.
- Syria’s President Bashar al-Assad killed 1,429 people; a toll that he said included 426 children. (onemorecup.wordpress.com)
- Assad: US Won’t Thwart Syria’s War on Terror (novinite.com)
- Assad Offered Asylum by Russia (darkgovernment.com)
- Iran tells UN it is ready to solve Syria crisis: report (theiranproject.com)
- Erdogan: Syrian Strike Should Topple Assad (israelnationalnews.com)
- Pentagon pushback: Joint Chiefs said to oppose Obama’s Syria strike order (worldtribune.com)